This is going to be a long message, so please try to get through it, even though I know it is going to be really hard for almost everyone to hear.

If you prefer to watch a video, click on this link: Watch the video.
But I think it might be easier to get through by reading it, instead.

To begin with, no one really knows who wrote the gospels, and the names given are nothing more than educated guesses by Christians sometime in the second century.

The time line for each gospel is that Matthew was written circa 75- 85 A.D., Mark 70-75 A.D., Luke 80-90 A.D., and John 90-100 A.D., just before he is know no have died. As an interesting factoid, John was the only disciple not martyred.

There has to be some question why he wrote the gospel so much later than the other writers, being some 60+ years after the events he is supposedly recalling accurately. But more than this speculation, there are so many parts of John that are not like the other three, and in fact are in direct contradiction to what the other three say.

The other three are synoptic gospels, mainly giving a historic narrative of the teachings and events in Yeshua’s lifetime, also showing his lineage to prove his descent from David.
John’s gospel contains over 90% original material, using long theological and overly-spiritualized diatribe instead of the short, parables used in the other three. Another major difference is that it is only in John’s gospel do we find regular use of the “I am” statements, which are used, clearly, to indicate a divine presence of Yeshua.

Now let’s go chapter by chapter to find things that do not match or contradict what the other three gospels say.

John 1:29-34 has John the Immerser proclaiming that Yeshua was the lamb of God as he came to be immersed (1:29-34) and he says he saw the spirit coming down onto Yeshua like a dove. But he also says that he wouldn’t know who the Messiah was until the spirit came down on him.
Okay, so John the Immerser proclaims Yeshua as the lamb of God when he first sees him, before he was baptized, but then later in the Gospel it says John the Immerser didn’t know Yeshua was the son of God until AFTER the immersion!

So, what is it? Did he recognize him immediately or not? And in Matthew 3:13 John recognizes who Yeshua is and he says Yeshua should be baptizing him.

So the gospel not only contradicts itself, but is very different fromt he same event as described in Matthew. The one thing all four have in comment is the declaration of the spirit coming to land on Yeshua.

John 1:35 describes how Yeshua chose Simon and Andrew in a totally different manner than the other gospels, saying that they were with John the Baptist and they followed Yeshua when John declared him to be the son of God. But in the other three, Peter and Andrew were fishing when Yeshua calls them to follow him. This is a significant difference, in that John has them following the Baptist while the other three have them fishing.

And in John 1:42 Yeshua first meets Simon and then renames him Peter, while in Matthew he doesn’t say that until Matthew 16:16, after Simon proclaims Yeshua to be the Messiah. In Mark he doesn’t rename him until later when in Mark 3:13 he appoints the 12.

In John 3:17 he says he did not come into the world to judge but to save, yet later in John 9:39 he says he came into the world for judgement. Whether we want to say that his presence was a judgment on those who rejected him, or he judged people who rejected him, either way, judging passively or actively, his presence DID create judgement, and that is in direct contradiction to him saying he did not come to judge but to save, especially if his presence acted as any kind of judgement which did not save but ended up condemning! In John 3:19, Yeshua actually says that there is a judgment, right after he says he did not come to judge!

In John 4 we read about how he talked to the Samaritan woman, even accepting a drink from her, and telling her that he is the Messiah (John 4:25-26). But in Matthew 16:20, Mark 8:29, and Luke 9:21 he specifically tells his disciples NOT to tell anyone he is the Messiah! In John 10:25 Yeshua answers the Judeans who ask him if he is the Messiah that he has already told them and they don’t trust him.

The next thing that is a complete contradiction of the other three is that in John 4, he not only tells the woman he is the Messiah, but teaches in their town for 2 days; but in Matthew 15:21 he says he came only for the children of Israel (Shomron was not considered to be Jewish). And although he did heal the slave of the Centurian (Luke 7:1) and healed the daughter of the Canaanite woman (Mark 7:24), he stated these two showed so much faith that he did as they said. But his objective was always the direct children of Israel, the Jews, and not anyone else. There is nothing in any of the other three gospels even indicating he taught anywhere but in Israeli lands.

In John 8:58 when Yeshua declares that “before Abraham was, I am” is clearly a definitive statement of eternal being. There is nothing even close to that in any of the other Gospels, and (as pointed out earlier) the use of the words, “I am” throughout John’s gospel is a clear claim of divinity, since God first used those words when Moses asked who he should say sent him.

In no other gospel except John does Yeshua come even close to claiming to be God, identified as God, as one with God, or any of the other spiritually confusing rhetoric we read in this one, unique gospel.

In John 12 he says that Judah the betrayer was stealing from the community purse he was in charge of, yet that is never mentioned or even implied in the other gospels. You would think something like that might be important to note.

Again we hear him say, in John 12:47 that Yeshua did not come to judge anyone, but then he says that what he has spoken will judge them. Well, what is it? If his word judges people, then he is judging them; passively or actively, they are being judged by what he is saying and that is a judgment that he is responsible for doing.

The betrayal is also described very differently. In Matthew 26:23, Yeshua only says the one who is dipping his bread with me will betray me, and then they all ask, “Is it I?”. In Mark 14 and Luke 22:21 he says the one dipping his bread with me, but in none of those three gospels does he address Judas directly as he does in John, nor do they say Judas was a thief.

In John 14:26 Yeshua says that the Holy Spirit will be sent by God in his (Yeshua’s) name, which does go along with the narrative in Acts 2:1; but, later in John 20:22, it says that Yeshua, after being resurrected, breathes on the disciples and gives them the Holy Spirit, which goes against the way Yeshua said it would be done and also against what is recorded in Acts.

He also tells them, at that time, they have the authority to forgive or not forgive sins. In the other gospels Yeshua says that all sins are forgivable (except against the Holy Spirit), but here he is saying, essentially, that if the disciples don’t forgive a sin it won’t be forgiven.

What happened to Matthew 6:14-15 when Yeshua said if we do not forgive someone’s sin, we will not be forgiven? Clearly this choice to forgive or retain sins is a direct contradiction to what Yeshua says in the other gospels, and to his teaching about that 7 times 70 times we should forgive thing, as well!

And what do the other gospels say about the Holy Spirit being given? There is no mention of the giving of the Holy Spirit in Matthew, Mark, or Luke. However, the Holy Spirit is only mentioned in Acts 2 as coming on the Disciples at the Shavuot celebration.

Here’s more!

Yeshua often refers to “their Torah” or ‘their law” when he is debating with the Power Elite in Jerusalem in John 10:34 and John 15:25. No Jew would ever say, “their Torah” because it is always our Torah, so he would say, “the Torah”.

Finally, when Yeshua is taken prisoner, John says he also went into the courts with Peter; in fact, John says he was known to the Cohen HaGadol and he was the one who got Peter into the courtyard. Now that would be an important thing to note, yet not one of the other three, all of which retell this part of the history, mention John ever being there. And nowhere is there ever any mention of John having any connection to or familiarity with the Cohen HaGadol.

And none of the other three have Tomas calling Yeshua his Lord and his God! They do call Yeshua “Lord”, but not to be confused with THE Lord, God the Father; rather with Lord being a title of authority.

And besides these obvious and undeniable contradictions to the other three gospels, which violates the interpretative tool called Hermeneutics, the overly spiritualized double talk- if could you see him you would see me but you don’t see me so you can’t see him, but since you see me ….yada-yadda-yadda- is confusing and unlike the way Yeshua talked or taught in any of the other three gospels.

Because of these many, many issues, I have come to believe that this gospel is not just a false one, but was not even written by the same John who lived and walked with Yeshua. The emphasis on the divinity of Yeshua, the different way Yeshua talked, and the many contradictions to the other gospels has inevitably led me to the conclusion that I think this was written by a Gentile using the name John (it could have been his real name) who was not a direct disciple, but one whose purpose in writing this so-called gospel was to write a gospel that would help to further separate the Gentile believers from the Jewish believers.

Remember also that at the time this gospel was written, most of the Jewish leaders of the original movement accepting Yeshua as the Messiah had all but died out, and this Jewish movement was being taken further and further away from its Jewish roots, creating a totally different religion based not on Yeshua’s Torah teachings as much as on the misinterpretation of letters written by Shaul to congregations of Gentiles who were being pressured to get circumcised and having power struggles within their organizations.

Another factor at that time was the animosity between Judea and Rome was building, coming to a head in 132-33 A.D. with the Bar Kokhba rebellion. These Gentiles who were being taught Torah began to think that the closer they got to a Jewish lifestyle, the more Rome would consider them Jews and not Romans, putting them on the firing line, so to speak, with the Jewish population. As pagans they were safe, but as Jews they were a target for Roman persecution, so they decided it was safer to change their form of worship.

Of course, that idea backfired because after the Jews were put down for good, this new religion become a target for Rome.

At the end of the first century, as noted by Ignatius of Antioch in 110 A.D., Gentiles were already meeting on their own Sabbath, which they changed to be on the first day of the week.
When John’s gospel was written, by then the move away from Torah and Judaism had been well under way, and this is why I believe this gospel, so contradictory to the other earlier gospels and the only one where there is clearly a desire to prove Yeshua is God, was definitely written in order to keep any self-respecting Jew from wanting anything to do with this guy Jesus (as is still true to this very day), and so was not written by the real disciple, Yochanan ben Zebedee but by a Gentile man using the name John.

All this being said, I still read the book when I am going through the Bible because although I know it is a false gospel designed specifically to keep Jews out of the (now) Christian religion, and also to prove the divinity of Jesus (which is more along the lines of the prior Pagan beliefs those Gentile believers were comfortable with), it does have some things in there of value.

Hey, accidents happen, and this one accidentally has some proper worshipful stuff in it.

So read it if you will, but be aware of the differences and contradictions, and know that God never changes. If you are reading something in a version of the Bible that doesn’t jive with any other part of the Bible or any other Bible you have read, know it to be questionable at best, and probably wrong at worst.

There are so many different versions of the Bible in so many hundreds of different languages that you have to read every one of those versions with discretion and discernment. And remember that the New Covenant writings are by Jews, but there wasn’t any Jew, ever, who was part of the coalition which put that part of the Bible together! According to Google, by the late second century (around 170–200 A.D.), a core collection—including the four gospels and the letters of Paul—was widely accepted and cited as authoritative by church leaders like Irenaeus.

The criteria used for judging which texts belonged in the Bible was based on apostolic origin (written by or closely tied to an apostle), orthodoxy (consistent with true Christian teaching, which by then was very different from Torah), and widespread liturgical use.

Widespread litugical use is another way of saying what the people were used to because they liked it, and not having to obey Torah is a lot easier than having to obey it.

And when they say it was based on Christian teaching, that is based mostly on Shaul’s (Paul) letters, and had little or nothing to do with Torah anymore.

Thanks in part to this so-called Gospel of John, by the middle of the second century what had been a Jewish movement to accept Yeshua as the Messiah God promised to send became an anti-Torah religion that proclaimed Jesus was God, replacing both the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob and the Torah he gave us with man-made tenets, holidays, and even changed the Anointed One of God (the Messiah) into a Gentile Savior who they worship in place of God.

So, nu? Now you know why I cannot accept John’s gospel as a real gospel, but rather as a means of further separating Gentiles from Jews by making Yeshua into God and, by doing that making it nearly impossible for Jews to join in.

If you are still here, please comment and consider sharing this message, as well as all my others, with everyone you know. Hey, after all, you never know how fertile the soil is until you plant a seed in it.

That’s it for this week, hoping those who follow this ministry will continue to do so, and also hoping that I have upset many of you who have been taught that John’s gospel is the most important one by making you think, “I hate to admit it, but he makes sense.”

Let me wish you an early Shabbat Shalom and a very joyous Shemini Atzeret!

Okay, let’s start by remembering exactly who Yeshua is and how he lived: he was, is, and always shall be the Jewish Messiah who lived a perfectly observant Torah life.

Now, can we agree that, in general, to follow someone is to do as they did?

If you said “No”, then close this page and go play Solitaire or stream something stupid because nothing I say from this point on will matter to you.

If you said “Yes” and if you are not Jewish, then do you live your life trying to be as obedient to the Torah as Yeshua was?

Now, if your answer to that question is either “No”, or what may be worse, it is “I am a Gentile believer and as such I do not have to follow the Torah”, then the next thing is to ask yourself is this question:

“How can I follow Yeshua when I do not live or worship as he did?”

If you prefer to watch a video, click on this link: Watch the video.

That’s a tough question, isn’t it? I think the reason it is tough is because there is really no logical or even sensible answer that would explain how you can follow someone when you don’t do anything they do.

I probably should stop right here because, well…what else is there?

Either you live the same way Yeshua lived, or you are following someone else: there is no way around that because it is a given, a prima fascie condition, an absolute truth.

My suggestion is that you go back to the Gospels (just the first three- ignore John’s gospel because it is a false one) and see that Yeshua taught exclusively from the Torah and never said anything even close to suggesting people ignore his father’s instructions or reject what God said to do.

You want to know where all that drek about Gentiles not having to obey the Torah comes from? It’s from letters men wrote to Gentiles trying to teach them the Torah a little at a time, which later were transformed into justification for rejecting the Torah.

Shaul’s (Paul) letters are convoluted Jewish logic and so have easily been misused and misinterpreted to fit a Gentile desire to reject the Torah, yet somehow making-up reasons why they can still be saved.

(By the way- Jewish logic is my own term, and I explain it as we Jews will answer questions with questions and never tell you what something is until we tell you everything it isn’t.)

It is easy, really- the only place in the entire Bible where God, himself, tells us how he wants us to worship him and how he wants us to treat each other is found ONLY in those first five books. God doesn’t make any new commandments or tell us we can ignore any of the existing ones that he dictated to Moses anywhere throughout the rest of the Bible.

I can’t stand the fact that the Torah is called “The Mosaic Law” because it isn’t from Moses! The only thing Moses had to do with the Torah is that he was God’s stenographer, taking down what God told him to write and teaching it to the people.

In truth, everything after Deuteronomy is either historical narrative or commentary.

So, nu! … I will leave you with this thought:

If you really want to follow Yeshua, to do what he did, to act as he acted, to worship as he worshipped, then you have to live in accordance with the Torah.

How can you say you love and worship God and want to be as Yeshua is when you reject and ignore what God said to do and what Messiah Yeshua did when he was on the earth?

I was going to stop here, but I think I need to add one more thought for you.

We all will have to meet God at Judgement Day, and when asked why we lived the way we did, anyone who has rejected the Torah will have to say,

“I did what they told me I should do.”

Now, I can’t speak for God, but I think he will respond with something to the effect of:

“I know you did what they told you to do, but it is what I say that counts.”

PLEASE! Consider that if you think following some man-made religion will save you.

Thank you for being here and please comment and share these messages with everyone you know, even non-believers. Hey, after all, you never know how fertile the soil is until you plant a seed in it.

That’s it for this week, so l’hitraot and (an early) Shabbat Shalom!

Growing up Jewish, I was subject to many accusations from my Christian friends stating that it was us Jews who killed God (meaning Jesus Christ).

Of course, my reply was that it was the Romans who actually killed him, but now I know it wasn’t really them.

If you prefer to watch a video, click on this link: Watch the video.

The answer to who really killed Yeshua is…. I did.

Actually, you did, too!

In fact, everyone killed him; without his death, God’s desire that no one should have to die (Ezekiel 18:23) cannot be accomplished.

God wants everyone, Jew and Gentile, to be in his presence forever because he doesn’t care about religion, he cares about faithfully believing in him and accepting Yeshua as the Messiah he promised to send. Without Yeshua’s sacrificial blood to cleanse us of our sins, no one has any chance of being forgiven.

God will not abide sin in his presence, so we need to be forgiven of our sins, which cleanses us, in order to be with him.

Yeshua’s sacrifice replaced the need to bring an animal to the temple in Jerusalem, which (according to the Torah) was the only place where any sacrifice would be accepted. With the destruction of the temple around 70-73 AD, there was no way for anyone to be forgiven, except by means of the innocent blood shed when Yeshua was killed.

That is why there is no way to the father except through Yeshua (John 14:6).

So, if everyone else on the earth was 100% righteous, with me being the only exception, I believe Yeshua would have undergone all the torture he did and even die…just to save me.

And he would have done the same just to save you.

So, it wasn’t the power elite in Jerusalem who killed him, although they set him up for death.

And it wasn’t Pilate who killed him because all he did was pass a judgement that he didn’t want to, but did so under duress from the people.

And the soldiers who nailed him to that execution stake didn’t kill him, because, well…he was alive even after they did it.

And even God, who accepted his spirit (Luke 23:46), didn’t really kill him since Yeshua asked him to do it.

No, it wasn’t Jews or Romans or even God who killed Yeshua- it was me, it was you, it was all of us.

If we had not been sinning, then even after being forgiven continuing to sin (because it is in our very DNA to do so), Yeshua would not have had to die.

Truthfully, if we were able to be sinless there would be no need for a Messiah at all.

Lucky for us, God knew better.

I believe he had planned for the Messiah since the very beginning, which is why John says that everything was made through him (John 1:3), meaning all that God did was designed with the Messiah in mind.

The next time you hear someone place blame on anyone for the death of Yeshua, you just tell them:

“Truth is the one who caused the death of the Messiah is…YOU!”

Thank you for being here and please comment and share these messages with everyone you know, even non-believers. Hey, after all, you never know how fertile the soil is until you plant a seed in it.

That’s it for today, so l’hitraot and Baruch HaShem!

It is assumed that Yeshua was sacrificed in the year 33 AD, and that the temple in Jerusalem was destroyed around the year 72 AD, roughly two generations later.

I believe God sent Yeshua when he did because he knew the temple would be gone, and with it the only way we could be forgiven of sin.

If you prefer to watch a video, click on this link: Watch the video.

To start with, the Torah states that God will not accept any sacrifice unless it is performed at the location where he will place his name (Deuteronomy 12:5), which was first at the entrance to the Tent of Meeting, then as the tent moved to Gilgal then Shiloh, and finally to the City of David, people had to travel there to make their sacrifices.

After Solomon built the temple in Jerusalem, that was the last (and still the only) place where God put his name, and therefor where sacrifices will be accepted.

Now, I think we all can agree that God knows what is going to happen, even if the only reason he knows that is because he can make whatever he wants to happen, happen, and happen exactly when he wants it to happen, and happen exactly the way he wants it to happen.

As my generation used to say, he is a real “happening” kind of guy!

So, knowing that Rome would soon be destroying the temple, and based on his never-ending desire to forgive us of our sins (Ezekiel 18:23), I believe he sent Messiah Yeshua before the destruction of the temple so that afterward, we could still be forgiven of sin.

Okay, now you may be thinking that he should have sent Messiah way back sometime before 605-587 BCE, when the Babylonian exile occurred and the first temple was destroyed. With that event, there was no way for anyone to receive forgiveness.

My answer would be that maybe since the exile was punishment for not having obeyed the Torah regulations, God wasn’t at that time willing to forgive anyone. After all, they were being punished. They violated many Torah commandments, not the least of which was worshipping other gods, and the people also failed to give the land a Shabbat rest every 7th year for 490 years!

God exiled the people from the land to give it rest, and he chose to exile them one year for each Shabbat rest the land did not get, which over 490 years means they would be exiled for 70 years.

God is really good with math!

Since the exile would be only for a short time, I think God was not willing to allow forgiveness until the punishment was over. That may sound harsh, but he is God and who will tell him what he can or can’t do?

Not me!

So, after the exile the people did return and rebuilt the temple, beginning what we call the second temple period, and forgiveness of sin was once again available.

Let’s now fast-forward to when Yeshua made forgiveness of sin possible by his sacrifice, which replaced the need to bring an animal to the temple; that is why he said the only way to the father (i.e., being free of sin) is through him (John 14:6).

After Yeshua made forgiveness possible anywhere and any time, Rome destroys the temple making the path to forgiveness under the Torah impossible.

Impossible, that is, unless you have faithfully accepted that Yeshua is the Messiah and through his sacrifice forgiveness is still available.

I started out by saying I believe the timing of Yeshua’s appearance two generations before the temple destruction was planned, and now I’ll explain why I say that.

At that time there was no Internet, mail service took a long time, and the best way for news to spread was by word-of-mouth as people traveled to trade their goods and while tending their herds and flocks.

For people to be aware of what happened in Jerusalem when Yeshua was crucified, and especially what happened for the 40 days or so after he was resurrected, needed time to get spread around. The Gospels make it clear that many thousands of people knew of him, but that was in the general area around Jerusalem, mostly in the Southern Kingdom territory.

I read that he covered about 20 square miles during his three year ministry, 80-90% of it in the area of the Galilee, while Israel contained about 8,000 square miles during that time, so he didn’t cover that much territory.

But over two generations, some 40-50 years, I believe that much of what he did had time to spread all over the land, and that gave people time to accept him before the temple was gone.

Those who rejected him as Messiah would soon find themselves, their kids, and all their descendants stuck without any way to be forgiven of sin.

Of course, there is no biblical justification for this drash of mine, and I often have preached how it is dangerous to try to make an argument out of nothing, but I still think “what if” or “why that” now and then. I mean, we humans are curious and there is that innate need to know “why?” that I have found in nearly everyone I have ever known.

Myself, included.

So, nu?.. do you think I’m making any sense with this? Would you agree that it is possible God timed Yeshua’s appearance for the reasons I believe?

Let me know, and thank you for being here. Please do comment and share these messages with everyone you know, even non-believers. Hey, after all, you never know how fertile the soil is until you plant a seed in it.

That’s it for this week, so l’hitraot and (an early) Shabbat Shalom!

We all know that after Yeshua was resurrected salvation became available to the Gentiles who were willing to faithfully accept that Yeshua is the Messiah the God of the Jews promised to send.

And in doing so, they also obligated themselves to accept the same laws and way of life that the Jews led.

If you prefer to watch a video, click on this link: Watch the video.

Now, I’m sure that many Christians reading what I just wrote about the Gentiles being obligated to live as Jews lived if they accepted Yeshua as their Messiah are thinking:

“Well, no! We only have to do those 4 things in the letter they wrote (Acts 15) and the Torah is no longer valid for Gentiles because we have the law of Christ and we don’t have to follow the laws of Moses.”

I understand that is what many, MANY Christians have been taught, but I am here to say that is not correct.

Sorry, but the only place in the entire Bible where any of that church rhetoric comes from is not from God or Yeshua- it is a false teaching stemming from confusing language in letters written by a man to congregations of Gentiles he was teaching to be Torah obedient, but doing so slowly so that he wouldn’t lose them to their old habits.

Shaul (Paul) wrote to congregations that were started by him, teaching them the Torah but at a pace they could handle. That is why it has been so easy for Gentiles who did not want to worship God as God said to do (in the Torah) to change things around.

You see, at that time there was a constant rebellion against Roman rule by the Jews, and as these Gentiles began to accept Yeshua and be taught the Jewish way of worship, they felt they would be associated with the jews and, as such, become targets of Rome.

So, to politically protect themselves from Rome, they separated themselves from the Jews by changing how they worshipped.

And as for those 4 things in the letter James suggested, Christianity loves to teach that those are all Gentiles have to do, but James never said that! In fact, he suggested those 4 things as initial “must-do’s” never intending them to be the only things to do, and that is confirmed by Acts 15:21 when he said that these neophyte believers would learn the law of Moses while attending Shabbat services every week, when the laws were always being read.

So, again, sorry, but the truth is that Gentiles who accept Yeshua as their Messiah also have to accept the Torah as their way of life.

But they didn’t, and (as I mentioned) in order to separate themselves from the Jews, they decided to cover their own tuchas by changing how they worshipped from the way Yeshua worshipped to a way that was not pagan or Jewish, creating a new religion that was soon to be called Christianity.

And that is when they pruned themselves from the Tree of Life, which is the Torah. They created a new man-made religion which has rejected nearly everything God said he wanted from those who worship him.

They rejected his Holy Days and created their own.

They rejected his Shabbat and made their own.

In truth, they rejected God.

How did they reject God? Well, first off, when you reject what God says to do, you have rejected God, and by the middle of the Second Century they had created the idea of a Trinity which replaced God the Father with Jesus the Savior by making them one and the same entity.

Christians pray to Jesus, they ask Jesus for forgiveness of sins (which he, himself, said he could do only while on the earth in Matthew 9:1-8), and there is at least one Christian religion that says any priest can forgive your sins!

Personally, I think they came up with that idea because a celibate life is boring, and by creating this confession thing they could add a little vicarious excitement into their life by hearing what others were doing.

Remember the Bugs Bunny cartoon where Elmer chases Bugs up a tree? Bugs is at the end of a branch, with Elmer on that same branch sitting next to the trunk, sawing away at the part that Bugs is on. And when he saws all the way through the branch, the tree and Elmer fall, while the separated branch Bugs is on miraculously stays suspended in the air!

Christianity thinks it can do what Bugs did and get away with it.

If any Gentile states they have been grafted onto the Tree of Life but don’t obey the Torah, well they may have been grafted on at one time but by choosing to reject the Torah they have pruned themself from the Tree of Life, and are grafted onto nothing.

Thank you for being here and please remember to comment and share these messages with everyone you know, even non-believers. Hey, after all, you never know how fertile the soil is until you plant a seed in it.

That’s it for this week, so l’hitraot and (an early) Shabbat Shalom!